Society Of The Spectacle is a seminal work written by Guy Debord, leader of the Situationist International (SI for short), a radical avant-garde movement composed of artists, intellectuals, and political theorists. The SI is often credited with having a significant influence on the May 1968 Paris student and worker revolts. It remains as provocative now as it was in 1968, speaking of the creation of false images that manipulate us. Society Of The Spectacle tells of an endless parade of images and shiny objects that are paraded before us in order to keep us complacent, entertained, and subdued — an inoculation against becoming conscious of the domination and exploitation of the people, usually for economic and political gain.

At the core of this work is the truth that those who control the images also control the people. This means that change needs to be affected through a struggle over representation. This insight is key to all subsequent political movements, advertising campaigns, public opinion campaigns, and even wars. It may seem obvious to us now, but at the time it was novel and prescient.

Debord also theorizes the "flattening of life," where ethical, philosophical, and even spiritual questions are reduced to simplistic ideas and slogans, making the development of human consciousness and authentic individuality impossible - a similar argument to that made by contemporary Theodor Adorno in The Culture Industry, but interesting in the details of their differences.

Even Debord’s views are subject to flattening and commercialization, since modern capitalism has shown its adeptness to incorporating and neutralizing even it’s most fervent critics. The postmodern condition seems to be one where we clamor for more distractions from reality, for more spectacles, though we know these images to be illusions that will not bring us closer to truth, goodness, or beauty.

Perhaps this gives us some perspective in the age of AI, where images are further moored from reality. Nothing is new about the gap between what is real and it’s representation, and that reality is no less hard to ascertain.

---